Thursday, October 28, 2010

Wikileaks Is Zionist Poison

by Jonathan Azaziah

Disinformation is defined as ‘misinformation that is deliberately disseminated in order to influence or confuse rivals.’ It is used by governments to mislead and brainwash their citizen populations, instigate wars, and blackmail foreign regimes. It is the ultimate instrument of the media. The most effective disinformation is that which is comprised of falsehood as well as facts. Wikileaks, founded by Julian Assange, fits this description perfectly, right down to the letter. Seemingly overnight, it has become one of the biggest ‘whistle-blowing’ agencies in modern history. In reality though, it is one of the biggest disinformation projects in modern history, and it may be the most dangerous because it is masquerading as an organization of truth. The information released by Wikileaks isn’t new; it isn’t groundbreaking; it doesn’t hurt the US as much as people think, it’s fractional really; and it is overloaded with as much as propaganda as the day-to-day Zionist media is. This propaganda is benefitting someone. And that someone is the illegal usurping entity of Israel. Even the Israeli government itself thinks so (1).

Afghanistan Drivel

The first major ‘leak’ released earlier this year by Assange was about occupied Afghanistan in the form of more than 92,000 documents. These docs included ‘secret files’ about civilian killings by the US and NATO along with boogeyman stories about the long-dead Osama Bin Laden, garbage regarding the Taliban acquiring ground-to-air missiles, and plenty of lies about Pakistan’s intelligence agency, the ISI (2). There wasn’t a single document about the Israeli training of the Taliban (3), the massive drug profiteering by the Mossad (4), the CIA (5) and the US-puppet Hamid Karzai and his brother (6), Karzai’s connections to Unocal and Zionist war criminal Henry Kissinger (7), the clandestine Israeli business operations set up to take control of the oil fields in neighboring Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, and Kazakhstan (8), or the Russian-Jewish mafia, fully protected by the Zionist entity, selling guns to US-backed Afghan warlords (9). Why weren’t any of these massively important, critically damning events and operations mentioned? Because by doing so, it would incriminate the already internationally condemned Zionist regime. Journalists, bloggers and activists, from occupied Afghanistan and abroad, have been reporting on the vast civilian casualties in Afghanistan since US intervention began more than 30 years ago. Wikileaks revealed nothing that wasn’t already known; however, it did reinforce Zionist propaganda regarding the illegal ‘war on terror.’

Iraq Malarkey

The next major ‘leak’ by Assange’s organization, which has gained more notoriety than the previous ‘leak,’ was about occupied Iraq in the form of nearly 400,000 documents. Like the occupied Afghanistan disinformation, it included ‘secret files’ about mass civilian killings by US forces, torture by war criminal Nouri al-Maliki and his forces (which according to Wikileaks, US military officials attempted to halt) (10), US government failings in reprimanding Blackwater (XE) for committing murder (11), and brutal executions by the American and British occupiers mixed with more tripe about fictitious Al-Qaeda, nonsense about Iran training militant Iraqi militias and Iranian drones flying over Iraq (12), Iran smuggling guns, munitions, and explosives into Iraq (13), ridiculous accusations of the Lebanese Resistance movement Hezbollah training Iraqis in the art of kidnaping (14), slanderous attacks on Iran’s Revolutionary Guard, and other absurd assertions about the Islamic Republic involved in the murder of innocent Iraqis. The Wikileaks Iraq war logs also ‘reveal’ civilian casualties numbered at 66,081 (15). The logs also ‘reveal’ that Iraqi WMDs actually did exist, as US soldiers found chemical weapons labs, terrorist toxin specialists, and chemical weapons caches (16).

There was nothing ‘secret’ about American and British forces murdering, torturing and raping innocents in occupied Iraq. Like Afghanistan, Iraqi and international journalists, bloggers, and activists have been reporting the murder of civilians in Iraq since the beginning of the illegal occupation, with much more effectiveness than Wikileaks. The US military didn’t attempt to halt the puppet al-Maliki’s torture of unlawfully imprisoned Iraqis, they partook in it. They led the way after they signed off on it. They were the primary perpetrators (17). Secret prisons are still operating at this very moment where US forces barbarously torture innocent Iraqis (18). The US hired Blackwater’s contractors to instill fear and execute terrorism against the people of Iraq, of course it didn’t reprimand them. Erik Prince’s private army of terror was only doing what it was told to by the US government.

The concept of Hezbollah training foreign militias to meddle in state affairs is absolute lunacy; Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah himself has stated on numerous occasions that if Hezbollah wanted to overthrow the Lebanese government, they would’ve done so already (19). Their objectives (as evidenced by their actions), are to protect the Lebanese people, provide them with security and uphold their dignity. Hezbollah hasn’t undermined its own government, it is asinine to think it would undermine the government of another nation. The propaganda targeting Iran is pathetic; there are enough guns in Iraq thanks to American support of Saddam Hussein to last lifetimes (20), there was no need for Iran to provide weapons to Iraqi militias through ‘smuggling.’ The only drones that were flying in Iraq’s skies belonged to the repulsive Zionist entity, not Iran (21). The other accusations sound like concoctions dug up from the dungeons of Zionist think tanks and lobby organizations salivating for the destruction of the Islamic Republic, not the work of whistle-blowers attempting to expose corruption and disseminate truth. These accusations further the Zionist case for striking Iran militarily. These accusations are promoting more war, not peace.

Wikileaks must not have gotten the memo about civilian casualties in occupied Iraq. They are nowhere near 66,081. They have eclipsed the 1.5 million mark. Anything less than this, especially a number as low as the one presented by Wikileaks, is classic misreporting aimed at protecting the United States government and its collaborators. That is an insult to the 5 million Iraqi orphans and the 5 million Iraqi refugees. It is a slap in the face to the dead Iraqis whose names will never be known because they were incinerated by US and Israeli weaponry. And the notion that US soldiers found WMDs in Iraq, after the ‘Iraq has WMDs’ myth has been debunked as Zionist-designed propaganda over and over again, is frankly, infuriating. The only WMDs that exist in Iraq are the mark-77, white phosphorus, and thousands of tons of depleted uranium used in Basra, Baghdad, and Fallujah by the terrorist army of the US and strategically placed Mossad agents of Israel (22).

Targeted On Behalf Of Israel

Where are the leaks on the 55 Zionist companies profiting from Iraqi blood being spilled (23)? Where are the leaks on Iraq’s artifacts being stolen by Zionist agents (24)? Where are the leaks on hundreds of Mossad agents operating in Mosul (25)? Where are the leaks on the Mossad bomb-making facility in Kirkuk (26)? Where are the leaks on the Mossad murderers stationed in several villages around the devastated area of Fallujah (27)? Where are the leaks on the depleted-uranium-tipped IEDs of Zionist-owned Zapata Engineering that have massacred thousands in Najaf, Karbala and Tal Afar, just to name a few (28)? Where are the leaks on the Israeli arms dealers supplying weapons to CIA-trained death squads (29)? Where are the leaks on Zionist war criminal Paul Wolfowitz importing Shin Bet torture experts to train the US military (30)? Where are the leaks on Mossad conducting interrogations and torture in Iraq jails, including Abu Ghraib (31)? Where are the leaks that will actually tie the illegal war, which was exclusively designed by Zionists, to Israel? They don’t exist because Wikileaks isn’t concerned with uncovering the truth regarding the real criminals; they’re concerned with leading the public away from the truth to keep them under control. It’s COINTELPRO all over again.

The target of Wikileaks’ first release was the Islamic Republic of Pakistan. The objectives of the operation were to give credibility to war criminal Obama’s illegal drone strikes that have murdered over 1,000 civilians (32), raise the possibility of a future overt occupation, and cover up the meddling of Israel in occupied Afghanistan. It is vital to note that the de-stablization of Pakistan has been a Zionist objective since the declaration of al-Nakbah architect, David Ben-Gurion (33). The target of Wikileaks’ second release was the Islamic Republic of Iran. The objective of this operation was to slander two of the very few entities on earth resisting Israel, Hezbollah and Iran; as well as cover up the Zionist fingerprints all over the mutilation of Iraq. The IAEA has already inadvertently foiled the Zionist plan to attack Iran based on the nuclear premise, confirming that the Iranian nuclear program is peaceful in nature and has nothing to do with weaponization (34). The Zionist hasbara experts needed to try something new; through Wikileaks, the accusations of the Zionist Bush administration against Iran have resurfaced under the guise of ‘whistle-blowing.’ What a sham.


A final note needs to be made about Julian Assange, the man who has been praised as a freedom fighter, a revolutionary and a friend of the oppressed people. In a recent interview, he stated, "I'm constantly annoyed that people are distracted by false conspiracies such as 9/11, when all around we provide evidence of real conspiracies, for war or mass financial fraud (35)." It’s shameful that Assange is annoyed by those seeking truth regarding the reason 1.5 million innocents are dead in occupied Iraq, 1.2 million innocents are dead in occupied Afghanistan, and thousands of more innocent men, women and children are dead in occupied Palestine, Lebanon, Pakistan, Yemen and Somalia. 9/11 is anything but a false conspiracy; there is overwhelming evidence that American and Israeli officials didn’t just have foreknowledge of the event, but planned the attack and carried it out. It was a Mossad-CIA false flag used to protect the Zionist entity from any future military threat and expand the parasitic hegemony of the US and the illegitimate Tel Aviv regime throughout the world via the Zionist-inspired ‘war on terror (36).’ Someone insulting the seekers of 9/11 truth, slandering the righteous movement of Hezbollah, spreading propaganda about Iran which adds to the demonization campaign levied against the Islamic Republic by the Zionist lobby and the Zionist media, and deliberately leaving out Israeli crimes in occupied Afghanistan and Iraq is no freedom fighter; such a person is a liar and a propagandist.

Wikileaks’ most recent ‘leak’ about occupied Iraq was delivered to several mainstream news outlets including Al-Jazeerah, the Zionist New York Times, Der Spiegel of Germany, which has smeared Hezbollah in the past by despicably accusing the Resistance of selling narcotics (37), Zionist-controlled Le Monde of France which has also smeared Hezbollah recently (38) and The Guardian of the UK, in packages, as if it was some sort of gift for a holiday. This isn’t a leak. This isn’t an expose. This is a press release. This is a media spectacle. This is a circus to cover up real crimes. Those interested in seeing a real leak, in addition to real courage, should read the story of Mordechai Vanunu, who blew the whistle on Israel’s nuclear program and has spent the last 26 years in and out of Israel’s inhumane prisons, including 18 years consecutively with 11 of those years in solitary confinement (39).

Iraq was annihilated for the Zionist regime, as was Afghanistan. When discussing the destruction of these nations, and the murder of millions of their people, it is integral to the understanding of the crimes committed to discuss the Israeli role in these crimes. Any person or institution failing to do so is ignorant, a coward or a collaborationist. None of these persons have any place in the movement to restore the occupied lands to the indigenous people and bring their tormentors to justice. By supporting Wikileaks, you are not fighting the occupier. You are not honoring the martyrs. You are not combating imperialism. And you are not striking back at the oppressor. You are supporting Israel and the cover-up of the activities of its criminal network. Wikileaks is Zionist poison. Wake up.

~ The End ~


(1) Wikileaks Reports Could Halt Iran’s Nuclear Drive by Yaakov Katz, Jerusalem Post

(2) Wikileaks, Afghanistan and Pakistan by Muhammad Abdullah Gul

(3) Framing Pakistan: How The Pro-Israel Media Enables India’s Surrogate Warfare by Maidhc O Cathhail

(4) Intel Expert Says 9/11 Looks Like A Hollywood Show by Christopher Bollyn

(5) The Spoils Of War: Afghanistan’s Multibillion Dollar Heroin Trade by Michel Chossudovsky

(6) Wikileaks Is Israel, Like We All Didn’t Know by Gordon Duff, Veterans Today

(7) Profile: Unocal by History Commons

(8) The Great Game: The War For Caspian Oil And Gas by Christopher Bollyn

(9) Drugs For Guns: How The Afghan Heroin Trade Is Fueling The Taliban Insurgency by Jerome Starkey, The Independent; Red Mafiya: How The Russian Mob Has Invaded America by Robert Friedman (rip)

(10) Iraq War Documents Shed Light On Civilian Deaths, Prisoner Abuse by David Wood

(11) Iraq War Logs: Private Militarization Run Amok by Pratap Chatterjee, The Guardian

(12) US Shot Down Iranian Drone In Iraq, Wikileaks Confirms by Adam Weinstein

(13) Iraq War Logs Detail Iran’s Aid For Militias by Michael R. Gordon and Andrew W. Lehren, The New York Times

(14) Wikileaks Tip Iran’s Hand In Iraq by Samuel Segev, Winnipeg Free Press

(15) Iraq War Leaks: No US Investigation Of Many Abuses by Al-Masry Al-Youm

(16) Wikileaks Show WMD Hunt Continued In Iraq – With Surprising Results by Noah Shachtman

(17) Iraq Today: Afflicted By Violence, Devastation, Corruption And Desperation by Stephen Lendman

(18) Lawless Arrests, Detentions And Torture In Iraq by Stephen Lendman

(19) Sayyed Nasrallah: Bellemare, UN Protecting False Witnesses by Al-Manar

(20) Ho Hum, More Wikileaks Chickenfeed by Gordon Duff, Veterans Today

(21) Israeli Drones Said Operating Over Iraq And Afghanistan by Yossi Melman, Haaretz

(22) The Zionist Murderers Of Iraq by Jonathan Azaziah

(23) 55 Zionist Companies Working In Iraq Under Assumed Names by Yaqen News Agency, translated by Muhammad Abu Nasr

(24) Israel Hopes To Colonize Parts of Iraq as ‘Greater Israel’ by Wayne Madsen

(25) Facts Vs. Beliefs –Today’s Ancient Warfare by Jeff Gates

(26) Resistance Kills Mossad Agents In Iraq by The Egyptian Gazette

(27) Israel’s Battle In Fallujah by Rashid Khashana, Al-Hayat

(28) Iraq IEDs: Mossad/Zapata Engineering Conspiracy? by Cloak and Dagger; Israeli Made IEDs and US Zapata Engineering made IED Triggers Are Killing US, Canadian And NATO Soldiers by NB Gazette

(29) Israeli Officer Sells Weapons To Terrorists In Iraq by Press TV; CIA Death Squads Operating In Iraq by Henry Michaels

(30) Seymour Hersh And The Missing Zionist-Israeli Connection by James Petras

(31) Mossad Does Interrogations in Iraqi Jails: Human Rights Group by China Radio International English; What Were Mossad Agents With Fraudulent New Zealand Passports Doing In Iraq? by Jerry Mazza

(32) US Drone Strikes Kill 18 In Pakistan by Press TV

(33) Mossad And India Spy Agency Team Up, Target Pakistan by Tariq Saeedi

(34) IAEA Report: Zero Evidence Of Iran Nukes. US Orwellian Corporate Media: Iran Building Nukes? by Carl Herman, The Los Angeles Examiner

(35) Wanted By The CIA: The Man Who Keeps No Secrets by Matthew Bell, The Independent

(36) 9/11: Israel’s Grand Deception by Jonathan Azaziah

(37) Hezbollah Denies Der Spiegel’s ‘Cheap Fabrications’ by Al-Manar

(38) Le Monde: A Group Affiliated With Hezbollah Takes Photos Of The Hague by NOW Lebanon

(39) The Woman From Mossad: The Story Of Mordechai Vanunu And The Israeli Nuclear Program by Peter Hounam


  1. Wikileaks was a fraud the minute they discredited 9/11 truth. 9/11 and Israel, here:

  2. great and well written. Kudos, keep up the good work.

  3. Awesome, couldn't have said it better myself !

  4. Spot on. Assange is an indicator of just how desperate the 9/11 psychos are getting.

  5. its true, Assange is a shill. fails 911 test big time. its obvious with your eyes open once you're on the lookout for disinfo. thanks for this article, well said.

  6. Thank you everyone for reading; all of your comments are sincerely appreciated.

    To the gentleman that posted the link regarding Israel and 9/11, I will get to it over the weekened. You can also read my article on 9/11, entitled 9/11: Israel's Grand Deception; It is a detailed expose of the Zionist criminal network's false flag on that day.

    This article by the way, is only the beginning of the expose of Wikileaks. There are several elements yet to be discussed that I will be addressing in a future article coming very soon.

  7. To Peter Wakefield Sault, Assange and his organization are anything but spot on. As discussed in the article, they are liars and propagandists, and as I will discuss in the follow-up to this piece, plants for the CIA and Mossad.

    The people seeking 9/11 truth are not psychos, but well-informed, decent people who simply want to know the truth behind the event that triggered several ongoing genocidal wars and will most certainly be cited in any future genocidal wars carried out by the Zionist occupied government in the US.

    Their attempts at pursing the truth are anything but desperate; in fact, 9/11 truth is growing stronger everday and that's why Obama's Zionist information czar Cass Sunstein thinks they need to be infiltrated.

    You should research the varying scientific inconsistencies in the 9/11 commission report and then research the overwhelming evidence of Mossad involvement on that terrible day before making such idiotic statements.

  8. Jonathan, came across your site via Northerntruthseeker. Just read this piece and it's the best article I've read in a while. Thanks for the work you're doing. Keep it up.

    Assange is clearly a disinfo agent, which I've suspected for some time now. His statement regarding 9/11 is obviously a huge red flag to any informed individual.

  9. What you are spreading here are very unsubstantiated allegations. See:

    1. You claim, Julian Assange is a Zionist agent, because Zionist mouthpiece Jpost says he helped Israel. Funny. I wouldn't believe Jpost a word. It's just hasbara, like usual. The opposite is true. The War Logs make it harder for Israel to trick the US public into a new war for Israel, because fewer people in the US will buy the stories of clean.

    2. Neither the Afghan War Logs blame PAK for much nor do the Iraq War Logs blame Iran. The opposite is true. These files add proof to allegations of gross US war crimes on a massive scale. They might even be used as evidence to prosecute high-ranking US officials, most of them very friendly with Israel. It will disturb Zionist plans, when those people get prosecuted. To cover up the facts, some Zionist influenced media outlets tried stiockpicking docs from the logs and spin a stories against PAK and Iran from it.

    3. Julian Assange said he doesn't believe in 9/11 conspiracy. About half the world does neither. That is no proof that they are all Zionist agents. And in the end, the official story, that the Bushists didn't do anything to prevent 9/11, because they were just too busy with planning a war of aggression against Iraq on Israels behalf, isn't so much different from the allegation, that they were actively involved in helping Mossad to carry out the 9/11-attacks. Both, the official story and the conspiracy allegation are a cry for a tough new investigation and serious prosecution.

  10. To Bandolero, there is nothing unsubstantiated about what was revealed in this article as there is a list of sources following the conclusion of the piece. All of the information is there for anyone to see.

    Nowhere was it written that I believed Assange was a Zionist agent due to the musings of Jpost; It was written that Assange fits the profile of a Zionist agent due to his organization saying absolutely nothing about the Zionist destruction of Iraq and the Zionist crimes committed in Afghanistan, some of which were mentioned in the article. A whole book could be written on the Zionist desecration of these nations.

    Iraq's annihilation was designed by Zionists, funded by Zionists, and carried out by Zionists. Failing to mention Israel and its Mossad even once is highly suspect. And just for the record, Jpost functions as an unofficial spokesperson for the Israeli government. So when the Israeli government tells Jpost that Wikileaks benefits them, it is credibility galore straight from the horse's mouth.

    How do the War logs make it harder as you say for Israel to trick the US public when Israel isn't even mentioned in the War Logs? The War Logs further Israel's trickery by leading the American public to believe the war was morally wrong but not illegal, and not a war for the Zionist entity. Your premise is asinine.

    The Afghan War Logs prominently feature Al-Qaeda, the ISI, and the Taliban as frequent targets and the Iraq War Logs prominently feature 'Shia Militias,' the Iranian Revolutionary Guard and the Lebanese Resistance movement of Hezbollah as targets of smearing. Read the Logs again. Wikileaks didn't reveal anything new about US crimes; there had been proof of rape, murder, torture, and mass graves in occupied Iraq and Afghanistan for years.

    In fact, the war logs downplay the US role in the destruction of Iraq and shift the blame to Iraqi security forces that were 'ignored' by the US and blame ethnic cleansing on Iranian-backed militias and not Mossad, CIA and US special forces. Where is the Iraqi depleted uranium? Where is the Iraqi mark-77? Where is the Iraqi white phosphorus? They don't exist. Those substances were dropped on Iraq by America and Israel and Wikileaks mentions none of this in its war logs. It also grossly misrepresents the casualties ccount, stating that only 66,081 civilians died when several independent outlets have recorded at least a million dead. Did you read the article or just skim through it?

    Your logic that the the cover-up of Zionist involvement in Iraq will disturb Zionist plans and lead to the prosecution of war criminals is unadulterated lunacy. Wikileaks is protecting war criminals, not indicting them.

    Again, your logic, like the logic of Chomsky, Zinn and the rest of the Lefists is flawed. The US and Israel didn't just ignore 9/11 or 'didn't do anything to prevent it.' They partook in it. They planned it. They executed it. 9/11 is the crime of the century, and those who dismiss people investigating it as 'annoying' shouldn't be trusted. 9/11 is the reason for the war on terror, which is the basis cited for all genocidal wars. Debunk 9/11, debunk the genocidal wars. Protect 9/11, you protect the genocide. The reason why it must annoy Assange is because Mossad is all over the 9/11 false flag attack, and his organization has no interest in exposing the most prominent terrorist organization on earth: Israeli intelligence.

    Your points and comments have been noted, but you should really read the article again. You sound like someone from Wikileaks' public relations department and not a legitimate truth seeker. I appreciate your time.

  11. Hi, I think you got 'the wrong end of the stick' with a comment up there,

    Peter Wakefield Sault said...

    Spot on. Assange is an indicator of just how desperate the 9/11 psychos are getting

    He is saying that YOU were spot on, that Assange is a sign that they are getting desperate, the 911 psychos being the zionist regime.

    I had to re read Peter's comment a few times and i see nothing but praise and agreement from him, try reading it again yourself, I think an apology to Peter is in order !

  12. Amazing critique, beautifully expressed. Thank You.

  13. After reading Mr. Wakefield Sault's comment again numerous times myself, I've arrived at the same conclusion as you; his '9/11 psychos' comment was directed at the psychotic Zionist criminal network attempting to cover up its murderous misbehavior. You are right, an apology is in order.

    I do apologize Peter for misinterpreting your comment; my initial response was totally unwarranted.

    Thanks to all once more for reading, the follow-up to this piece will be completed very soon.

  14. Julian Assange, man of mystery, sex outlaw, stratospheric genius, hacker extraordinaire and globe trotting Pimpernel.... Returns to the The Larry King Show tonight to answer some hard ball questions about his hair.

  15. Great critique--the best I've read on the subject. Those were some of the same twists of the truth that set my "deceptacon" alarms to buzzing. Under reporting of the deaths-66,000 instead of the more than 1.5 million as discovered in research so respected that it made publication in the Lancet a few years ago. And statements made by Assange himself, "911 truthers annoy me" and the new war docs reveal that "the war is mitigated by Pakistan and possibly by Iran." ??? That's a load of crap and an obvious scripted comment.

  16. I think WikiLeaks seeks the truth in theory .. in practice it can only "leak" what is given to it .. so the masters of disinformation such as Mossad, CIA etc can swamp it with 1000s of "leaked" documents the same way corporate lawyers swamp defendants with masses of documents knowing they haven't got the man-power.

    I'm holding judgement on WikiLeaks and Assange. When someone goes public saying they had anti-Zionist leaks against Israel and WikiLeaks didn't help them then we'll know for (nearly) sure.

  17. Just to clarify my previous post, I think WikiLeaks is now being used by Zionists, CIA etc. as a tool to aid their disinformation tactics, but I don't think WikiLeaks itself is Zionist (yet).

  18. Thanks a lot!! Keep up the good work buddy.

  19. The Israeli propaganda front Wikipedia (founders Jimmy Wales, Larry Sanger and senior editor David Miller, etc.) – had a preview of the new Wikileaks files on the US-Turkish relations before they were made public on Sunday.

    As expected – the new secret revelations have no new information than what we have already been told by the Zionist mainstream media. Benji Netanyahu admitted that his government was already aware of the contents of the leaks. On November 29, 2010 – Fox News boasted: “All in all, WikiLeaks did not succeed in penetrating the most sensitive channels of U.S.-Israel relations”.

    This proves once again that the new Wikileaks information, most probably stolen by the agents of the powerful Israel Lobby (AIPAC) – and like the previous one, is meant to isolate United States from the rest of the world and create further division among Israel’s neighboring countries – which will make it more easy for the Zionist regime to control every US move.

    The confidential memo leaked by Wikipedia – articulates that Turkey foreign policy (tilted towards its Islamic roots) has “Rolls Royce ambitions but Rover resources.” The authors like the Israeli leaders – are particularly paranoid of Turkish Foreign Minister, Ahmet Davutoglu, for his personal religious leanings and for guiding Turkish foreign policy towards the Middle Eastern countries and Palestinian resistance – which the Zionist regime considers pro-Iranian and anti-Israel.

    “Major challenges with us in the coming months include the direction of Turkish-Israeli relations, the fate of the Protocols with Armenia, and the Turkish posture vis–vis Iran,” says the memo.

    The Wikileaks has claimed that Saudi Arabian King Abdullah had “repeatedly urged United States to attack Iran’s nuclear program” and China directed cyberattacks on the United States. It has also claimed that the Rahbar (Spiritual Leader) Ayatullah Ali Khamenei is suffering from cancer. The Zionazi dogs had similar prediction about Imam Khomeini in the 1980s, claiming that due to his advanced age he would not be able to stabilize the Islamic Revolution.

    Iran’s President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, dismissed the documents as “worthless mischief” which would not affect Tehran’s relations with its Arab neighbours, exposed as having pressed for a US military strike against its nuclear sites.

    According to Wikileaks, though Turkey is armed by the US – the great majority of Turks have negative views of NATO. However, the authors suggest that Turkey needs to accept the US and NATO’s leadership (aka submission to Israel) to extinguish fires in its backyard (Iraq, Afghanistan and Pakistan).

    “Even AKP leaders know that much of their allure or “wasta” in the Middle East and elsewhere stems from their privileged position in key Western clubs,” says the document.

    The authors acknowledge the AKP’s impressive efforts to resolve Turkey’s old festering conflicts with Cyprus, Baghdad, Erbil and Syria. As result, Turkey has gained leverage to tackle regional problems from Lebanon to Iran. However, Turkey’s “rapprochement with Syria has not really produced any Syrian “flip” away from Iran“.

  20. higher end officials operate under the belief/construct of al qaeda and imminent danger so of course the documents must reflect those myths to prevent deterioration from the top down. If the intent of the article is to suggest that Assange some how censored or contrieved the information as a zionist conspirator, well i dont believe thats substantiated. If youre trying to suggest that he didnt uncover the right documents, assuming they were available and or existed... well that still isnt his fault.

  21. well written, and please try to mention India in a better light. Most Indians are not even aware that israel and the jew-hijacked-US-Government is bad for the world. I am sure wikileaks is israeli misinformation. Can someone please enlighten me as to how the israeli zionists are usurping India's good name? Apart from their claim over Kashmir i don't think i have anything against Pakistan. In fact they are more like us than any other country, hell they were India till 1949. Plus i also am sure that the 26/11 attack on a 5-star hotel was carried out my Mossad and not Islamic terrorists.

  22. I completely and totally agree; Wikileaks is Zionist garbage.

  23. good post, I also sent a Rabbi Weiss video to red ice creations (another "underground" truth website) The video denounced Zionism as part of the Jewish faith, they initially posted it up, then removed it promptly. Red ice creations, shill site.

  24. This article is what the free Internet is all about.

    It is clear that any newspapers that take this Assclown seriously are themselves propaganda amplifiers. The entire media uproar about Assclown is 1000% phony. Hey Zion!!!! We know it was you, and this elaborate campaign does nothing but Confirm Your Guilt. You wouldve been better off just letting time cover it up for you, but no, you need your lying to have some kind of fake logical consistently, so you deployed Assclown to provide it.

    The ultimate shill, Julian Assclown. Zion, you just really blew it!!!!! We would probably have let it all go, if not for this huge stinker you jus laid on the world's carpet!!!!!!

  25. To Rehmat:

    Peace and blessings brother,

    Thank you for the information; I visit your blog often, and it's one of the best on the web.

  26. To scrxbandit:

    The purpose of the article was to expose Wikileaks as the Zionist propaganda front that it is. Wikileaks hasn't done anything but cover up the crimes of Zion in Iraq, Afghanistan and Pakistan, as well as slander the Lebanese Resistance and reinforce Zionist propaganda against Iran.

    The idea that the info in the documents that were leaked 'aren't Assange's fault' is beyond pathetic, and exceedingly ridiculous. Assange's organization released the documents to the Zionist media, of course it is his fault, of course he's responsible for it.

    And it doesn't matter whether the documents were obtained from US officials or officials from Jupiter; if all of the info benefits the Zionist entity, how can anyone support it?

    Finally, Assange praised Benjamin Netanyahu's remarks about Wikileaks, implied that Iran's nuclear program is a problem and despicably blasted 9/11 truth. All of this blatantly implies that he is nothing more than a shill for the Khazarian Zionist power brokers. Give me a break.

  27. To KBX:

    Thank you for reading brother, but I will most certainly not portray the Hindutva entity in a better light. India is a racist, oppressive and genocidal regime that has been illegally occupying Kashmir for 63 years and has murdered over 100,000 innocent Kashmiris since 1989.

    Hindutva is the same toxic ideology as Zionism, and these two despicable ways of thinking have been closely aligned since the early fifties.

    India buys weapons from the Zionist entity en masse, and uses the weapons to murder innocents in Kashmir; India's intelligence service, RAW, is closely allied with Mossad; and the two racist entities collaborated in committing crimes against humanity in Kargil, as well as in the 26/11 terror attack which was erroneously blamed on Muslims.

    India needs to be exposed just like the Zionist-occupied US government and the vile usurping Tel Aviv entity need to be exposed. And it needs to continue being exposed until Kashmir is free of occupation and the oppressed people of India are no longer subjected to Hindutva's brutality. The link below provides documented evidence of everything presented here. Peace.

  28. Peace and blessings to everyone.

    I am currently gathering information for Wikileaks Is Zionist Poison II; it will deal with the current propaganda in the 'cablegate' leaks and some shocking revelations about Assange and his team. It should be ready by the end of next week God willing.

    Thank you all again so much for your time, your input, your comments and your support.

  29. Azaziah thanks again for another good article.

    I want to notice the next point, maybe you could figure it out:
    Could wikileaks not be a virus source?
    In the summer (I believe end of July) the first time Wikileaks started publish documents about Iraq, Afghanistan, etc.
    In September the Iranian nuclear installation had been infected so the Iranians could not start their work.

    Now Wikileaks writes about an insurance file (to prevent arresting Assange and demolish its organization, they say). That insurance file could be a bait for the targeted ones (Iran especially). Wikileaks says it contains more secret information than before, the targeted ones will surely download it in order to get the information inside.

    I hope you can check this out.

  30. That is very interesting indeed. I will definitely look into it. It seems like it could be connected to the recent Stuxnet virus that Israel implanted in Iran's security apparatuses to tamper with the Islamic Republic's nuclear program. If it warrants a mention, I'll definitely include it in the second Wikileaks installment. Peace.

  31. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

  32. Hey Jonathan,
    If I translate your excelent article into Spanish will you post it here?

  33. Peace and blessings Rafael,

    It would be an honor if you translated my article, but I will not include the full text here, as this is an English blog. What I will do however, is include the link to Spanish on the article, right after the phrase, 'The End.' Thank you so very much for the gesture brother and let me know when the translation is complete.

  34. I am still finding this difficult to process and swallow - I definitely think Julian Assange consulted and "edited" the leaks for Israel (when he met with the "leadership" of that "country") but that doesn't necessarily discredit ALL of it. I think there may be valuable information in at least some of these documents, whether controlled opposition or not.

    All I'm saying is, let's not burn bridges before they're even used. Only 0.5% of the cables have been released, 99.5% to go. Let's see what they've got in store before we relegate this to the realms of hasbara.

  35. Ill tell ya.. reading your retorts to those few comments were just as enjoyable as reading the article itself. Youre an awesome writer. Even better rapper ;)
    Keep it up!

  36. From France, thank you very much for this great job !! In our country we must face to a very powerfull sionist propaganda and this is very helpfull for us to escape the mind control ;-)
    Somebody translate your text here in french
    so we are posting it anywhere the sionists try to influence the french people! Thank you again ! And sorry for my english...

  37. To Bardamu:

    You don't have to apologize at all brother, your English is good =)

    Thank you so much for the translation, and please keep fighting against the Zionist Power Configuration in France. Truth and dignity are our weapons, and we will prevail God willing.

    Peace and blessings.

  38. I am confused. Bradley Manning is the one who leaked the 250,000 diplomatic cables to Wikileaks, is he not? So how is Mossad involved in this? I know Israel paid Assange to keep information about Israel out so I am not talking about that. Could it be that the information leaked is just of mediocre value? I am talking about the diplomatic cables particularly. And that they seem to support the campaign to invade Iran because many of the reports we see in the media have been handpicked by the media which has an anti-Iran bias? Once again I am referring to the diplomatic cables.

    Has it been confirmed that Manning is the source of the diplomatic cables? If he was, how did he gain access to them from Afghanistan and Iraq? Wouldn't he have had to have been in Washington DC to get access to them?

    My theory was that Mossad leaked the diplomatic cables to Assange but I have read in Wikipedia and other places that Manning confessed to the authorities that he leaked the diplomatic cables.

    I think this is crucial to determining the authenticity of the cables. If it was Manning who leaked them, I don't see how the Zionists can be involved. I doubt there was an agent who led him to do this. Also, the videos are very damaging. If it wasn't Manning who leaked the diplomatic cables, then that changes everything.

    BTW, I believe the Zionists did the 9/11 attacks.

  39. Peace and blessings.

    Thank you for your comment and your insight brother.

    In reference to the diplomatic cables, it is important to note that the documents are digital, and therefore, they are impossible to verify.

    The Zionist media has widely reported that Manning is the source, but in reality, these entities do not know. Even Julian Assange himself has admitted that he doesn't know who his sources are, or where the documents originated, and he further stated that he never heard Manning's name until Zionism's media machine began speaking about him. This is obviously to cover up who is really behind his organization.

    While Wikileaks' official Twitter page displays an avatar that states 'Free Bradley,' Assange's organization is doing nothing to provide for his legal defense, going back on a previous promise.

    'Alternative' media is now reporting that Bradley Manning is being tortured, but would someone being maliciously tortured by the US military ask his 'supporters' to remember the military who are separated from their loved ones due to deployment? I.e. committing murderous war crimes in occupied Iraq and occupied Afghanistan.

    Manning is a distraction to detract from where the leaks are really coming from: Mossad and the CIA, as you asserted, and as I laid out here in my sequel to this article.

    The rule of thumb is brother, if the Zionist media is telling you to believe something, do yourself a favor and do the exact opposite.

    Happy holidays to you.

  40. This is a perfect example of good logic based on some shaky assumptions, producing shaky conclusions.
    Just because the leaks were mostly self serving, does not necessarily imply that they were fabricated. It is possible that the diplomats and U.S. people who created the secret memos/files themselves were biased, misinformed, or simply were offering an opinion based on their own version of the truth.
    Also, it would be rather shocking if the leaks were negative towards Israel. Just as in public, privately American diplomats do not criticize Israel for known reasons.
    The leaked documents should be taken for what they are: secret memos, and internal diplomatic communication that contain some facts when they pertain to meetings or events, AND secret opinions when they pertain to viewpoints on certain political figures or political groups.

  41. By admitting that the leaks were 'mostly self serving,' you have disqualified the remainder of your argument brother. Anything that serves the Zionist agenda cannot be trusted, period. In addition, your argument, which doesn't have a firm foundation at all, has been demolished, demolished again and re-demolished for good measure here:

    Besides brother, 'Wikileaks Is Zionist Posion' is about the ridiculous Afghan and Iraq war logs, which made absolutely no mention of Zionist crimes against humanity in either occupied nation. Next time, you should read the article carefully before replying with irrelevance.

    The link that I posted is the sequel; it represents the deconstruction of Cablegate and it proves that the cables are in fact fabricated.

    Peace and blessings.

  42. Thank you for this article. Keep up the good work and writing.

  43. Bravo!! Everything I've been thinking about him since he blew up. Now mind you I can collaborate further by saying he is a disinformation agent sent to lure in the disillusioned poor Americans I.e. Specifically the non-participatory youth who donot see a point in supporting one alitist agenda over another... And those are our options. I believe it was a project to see if they could motivate, or light fire under lazy American asses that no one wants to drag along through society, to put it bluntly and uncandid. And it worked. So once again I see this tactic utilized by the Republican campaign, one year after this article was written, and another article of similar nature states that part of the agenda is to create a campaign against Obama. Almost one year later, Ron Paul is capturing the hearts of "truthists" and sad, retired Obama supporters in this country. Let it be on record, I am suspect of that man...


Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.